Bump nixpkgs stable link to 23.05 #90
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'll get this PR approved so it's up to date. re: repology, it looks like winget/scoop already have |
reiichi001
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this'll need doing again in a couple of months, but may as well push this while I'm thinking of it.
sidenote: the repology outdated package detection seems affected by the differing version number scheme of windows xivlauncher, as distributed by winget and scoop... I think the solution (beyond "make a single unified launcher" or "go back in time and rename all the linux packages") is to add a
split-ambiguitiesrule to https://github.com/repology/repology-rules, so that FFXIVQuickLauncher and XIVLauncher.Core get different names on repology, but I don't know what those names should be.